Once again the Olympics have been
besieged by scandal . . . but for once it is not drugs or doping. Nope, the XXX Olympiad is being rocked by the
scandal of “not trying”. First it popped
its ugly head up in the badminton competition where eight ranked players were
disqualified for tanking games in order to receive easier draws in later
competition. Now it has shown its
presence on the track where an Algerian middle-distance runner named Taoufik
Makhloufi was kicked out of the Olympics for “not trying”.
The International Association of
Athletics Federation’s rule on this states that if an athlete is found failing
“to compete honestly with bona fide effort'', that he or she can “be excluded
from participation in all further events in the competition.'' Makhloufi was accused of tanking in the
qualifying race of the 800 meters when he stopped running during the first
lap. Makhloufi had earlier qualified for
the 1500 meter race in which he was one of the favorites to medal. He was the African champion in the 800. The accusation is that he was tanking the
race in order to save energy for the 1500 the next day. With his disqualification he basically was
thrown out of the Olympics and his actions cost him not one, but two races and
chances of medaling. I guess that is the
price one pays for wanting to win.
The XXX Olympiad seems intent on
making sure that these competitions are at the level of the high standards and
ideals upon which the Olympics are known throughout history; yet, at the same
time, their enforcement seems a little hypocritical. There are all sorts of questionable activity
within the Olympics that border on cheating of one sort or another. The big one for the past couple of decades
has been the drugs and doping—hardly any arguments with that one. Now the one for “not trying”--there could be
some arguments with that one. I think
that those caught tanking in the badminton competition got what they deserved .
. . Makhloufi, well, he didn’t do anything that has not been done for years and
years in track competition. He tanked a
race in order to do better in another race where his chances for medaling were
better. Ask college, high school, or
junior high school track coach and he or she will tell you that they have told
their runners to tank a race to save their energy for another race. Or, they have run substitute runners to
qualify and then change the team with faster runners in the finals. It is all
done in the hopes of winning.
Makhloufi’s sin? He didn’t hide
the fact that he wasn’t trying—he just stopped.
He should have at least jogged around the track at a snail’s pace and
finished dead last.
The Olympics do not tolerate cheaters
. . . so, what is this in the bike road racing where teams block and draft for
their best racers? Seems like cheating
to me. Or what about those swimmers who
slow down at the end of their race once they know they have made it to the next
round—is that 100 percent effort? As I
stated above, the Olympics have high ideals and standards, but they seem a
little hypocritical to me.
But this is not about the Olympics as
much as it is about life. What would
happen to any of us if this idea of “not trying” was enforced in our everyday
lives? What if we were graded daily as
to whether or not we were giving an honest bona fide effort in our living of
life? How would we fare? Would we be disqualified? Think about it.
It is scary . . . scary to think what
would happen to us if we were graded on our effort. I think I would be quickly disqualified. I think of my life and the effort I put throughout
it. I did not give 100 percent when it
came to my education . . . nope, there were years that I just cruised through
with the minimal effort. Parenting . . .
well, you know, sometimes you just get tired and need to lock yourself in a
nice hiding place to escape the kids . . . a 100 percent effort? Work?
We probably shouldn’t go there as my employers might be reading this,
but I probably fail there too. Same with
marriage . . . friendship . . . dieting . . . and even one’s faith. What would happen to any of us if our efforts
were graded as to whether or not we were giving an honest attempt to do our
best? I know I would have been banned
from competing in life a long, long time ago . . . and, I think that most of us
would.
Competition and life would be great if
it was truly as black and white as the Olympic officials attempt to rule their
competition. But it is not. There are a
lot of shades of grey between that black and white. It is peculiar how we hold our heroes up to
stringent black and white ideals, while we ourselves do not even come close to
expecting the same thing from ourselves.
Seems a little silly to rant and rave about a runner who dogs a race in
order to do better in another race, while we are not giving 100 percent in the
daily activities we do in our lives. The
runner did what countless other runners before him have done--he shifted
emphasis in order to do his best elsewhere.
Is that cheating? According to
the officials at the Olympics it was . . . for the rest of us, we will wonder.
Luckily there are no “life officials”
who are out there grading our efforts on a daily basis. If there were we’d all be in trouble. Yet, at the same time I do know that I have
been called to do the best that I can by one who is higher than any Olympic
official—God. God desires for me to be
the best that I can be in who God created me to be. In the end it is to God and myself that I
must answer on whether or not I gave an honest effort.
Yes, the disqualification of Taoufik
Makhloufi makes one contemplate . . . in the meantime maybe we all should just
try to do the best that we can no matter what it is that we are doing. In it all let us give it our best effort!
No comments:
Post a Comment