Ann
Coulter @AnnCoulter on October 23
Obama:
"Stage 3 Romneysia" - because cancer references are HILARIOUS. If
he's "the smartest guy in the room" it must be one retarded room.
Ann
Coulter @AnnCoulter on October 22
I
highly approve of Romney's decision to be kind and gentle to the retard.
This is not a “political” rant . . . I
think folks need to keep that stuff to themselves much like they do their sex
lives, bank accounts, and whether or not they are cheating on their income
taxes--especially if the rant is to beat another into submission or to degrade
them because they disagree. Our society
has been filled with a lot of political rants for quite some time thanks to
this being an election year . . . and both sides are equally adept at it. It is
true that there is a right to the freedom of speech, but somewhere along the
line our society crossed the boundaries of decency, respect, and what Jesus
called his followers to—loving one another.
Because I do not watch much television
beyond my beloved Nebraska Cornhuskers playing football or volleyball, I really
didn’t know who Ann Coulter was. All I
knew is that she sure was in the headlines this week for referring to the
president of the United States as a “retard”.
So, I did what any half-way intelligent individual would do . . . I “googled”
her. What I learned was that she is an
intelligent individual with a good education (University of Michigan and
Cornell University), a lawyer (University of Michigan Law School), and a
conservative and political commentator, author, and syndicated columnist. Plus, she is obviously a beautiful woman . .
. but her words betray her. Twice in a
24-hour period she called the president a “retard”. It was not funny . . . it was mean, hateful,
and disrespectful no matter who she was referring to. Apparently that is her style during this
political season . . . check her out on Twitter
(https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter). Is this what the founding leaders of our
nation meant by “freedom of speech”?
Again, this is not a “political” rant
. . . this is a rant about using words to hurt and belittle others . . . this
is about using degrading words to describe others because we disagree . . .
this is about using the “R-word” that ranks right up there with using the “N-word”
and “G-word” . . . this is about doing as Jesus called for his followers to do,
love your neighbor as you love yourself.
It seems that there is not too much self-love evident during this
election year.
I grew up with and still have two
brothers with disabilities . . . the “R-word” was a constant taunt and put-down
growing up. I have two sons with
disabilities . . . and, again, the “R-word” was quite familiar. Anyone who knows me knows that I do not
tolerate such language to describe others.
Way back in March I wrote a blog—The
“WORD”—dealing with the Special Olympics campaign to “Spread the word to
end the word.” You can read that at http://www.bogw.blogspot.com/2012/03/word.html. I haven’t changed my opinion.
I imagine that there are those out
there who think that I am being too sensitive about the issue . . . that Ms.
Coulter and others are just kidding around and using tactics to get attention,
but the old children’s rhyme about “words not hurting” is a lie. Words do hurt . . . often for a lifetime and
beyond. I guess we should be thankful
that there are people out there like Ms. Coulter who remind us that words do
hurt and effect people as individuals and groups. It helps us to remember that it is necessary
for us to become “conscious” of our “words” as we speak them and our “actions”
live them. Violence does not only come
in the form of physical harm, but it also comes in the form of the words that
we speak and the actions or inaction we take.
A bruise may heal, but a spiritual bruise never leaves.
It is only right that someone speaks
out to say that a statement or action is unacceptable when it crosses the
line. It has nothing to do with who one
is voting for, but how we treat one another.
As I said, both sides have done a lousy job at treating each other with
respect or love. Nothing will ever stop
this decline unless we stop it . . . and stopping it begins with ourselves as
individuals. It begins within ourselves
and then spreads outward to include others.
If it does not begin with ourselves how can we expect anyone else to
change?
Is this the best we can do for those
who follow us . . . the children? Is
this the legacy any of us wants to leave for the generations to come? Stephen Sondheim wrote these “words” in his
wonderful musical (my all-time favorite), Into
the Woods:
Careful the things you say
Children will listen
Careful the things you do
Children will see and learn
Children may not obey, but children will
listen
Children will look to you for which way to
turn
To learn what to be
Careful before you say "Listen to
me"
Let us be careful out there . . .
people are listening!
No comments:
Post a Comment