Samuel Gompers, Can We Talk?

On September 4, 1910, Samuel Gompers, the first president of the American Federation of labor (AFL) wrote the following in the New York Times: “Among all the festive days of the year, of all the days commemorative of great epochs in the world’s history, of all the days celebrated for one cause or another, there is not one which stands so conspicuously for social advancement of the common people as the first Monday in September of each recurring year—Labor Day.”  According to Mr. Gompers Labor Day is the only holiday that celebrates the common man (and woman, though not then)—not religion, a war anniversary, or the birth or death of a famous person.  I disagree.  I think that Mr. Gompers and I need to talk.

Someone much smarter than me once said that a person’s religion is those standards that give meaning and dictate the way that one lives his or her life.  It is their purpose in life. This person argued this in saying that there were no non-religious wars . . . that all wars were religious.  Someone was always pushing one way of believing and living onto someone else who did not care to give up the way that he or she was already believing and living.  Another person, again probably much smarter than I, stated that the one true religion is economics . . . that all of life is dictated by economics . . . all of life.  Having now lived more than a half-century I am seeing a whole lot of wisdom in that statement . . . plus a whole lot of truth.  Based on that, I am not sure how Mr. Gompers came to the conclusion that Labor Day was such a clean and pure holiday that celebrated nothing but the common worker.

First of all, what do you know about Labor Day?

Did you know that Labor Day was a result of labor unrest?  In the late 1800s the labor movement was growing and beginning to have more and more influence in national politics.  On May 11^th, 1894, a strike took place in Chicago by the employees of the Pullman Palace Car Company to protest wage cuts and the firing of union representatives.  A month later there was a call to boycott all Pullman railway cars that basically crippled all rail transportation across the nation.  In typical government fashion, the federal government sent troops to Chicago to break the strike.  Well, when push comes to shove the strikers pushed back . . . riots broke out and more than a dozen workers were killed in all of the violence.

So, how does one make amends?  The federal government, under Congress, created Labor Day as a legal holiday to celebrate the social and economic achievements of American workers and their contributions to the strength and prosperity of the nation.  It was Congress’ hope that it could regain the support of the American workers.  After all, a little gesture can go a long ways in getting people back to work.  What good is an economy when no one is working?  The date? June 28^th, 1894, Congress designated the first Monday in September of each year to be a legal holiday.

Despite the recognition of the government and the establishment of a federal holiday, it would be nearly twenty years later before a whole lot of respect was shown to the common worker.  It was not until 1916 that workers were granted the eight-hour work day through the Adamson Act.  This Act established an eight-hour work day and additional pay for overtime.  Prior to that it was not uncommon for a laborer to work twelve-hour days for six days a week.   The movement towards a five-day workweek started in 1908 when a spinning mill in New England started accommodating its Jewish workers.  The Jewish workers had difficulty observing the Sabbath under the traditional six-day work week.  If they took Saturday off and worked on Sunday they risked offending the Christian majority, but to work on Saturday violated their own religious beliefs . . . so the owners went to a five-day work week.

In 1926, Henry Ford jumped on the bandwagon and started to close his factories over Saturday and Sunday to give his workers a two-day weekend without reducing their pay.  The first union to jump on board this movement was the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America as it negotiated a five-day work week for its members.  The nation ponied up to the five-day work week in 1938 when President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Fair Labor Standards Act that established a five-day, 40-hour work week for many laborers.  It has been said that it is at this point in history that the great American weekend was born.  It only took 40 years to get to this point in was a wonderful gift and recognition of the common worker, until 1938 most laborers were still working a six-day week . . . so, at best the holiday only gave them a two-day weekend, unlike out three-day weekend celebration of Labor Day today.

According to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of May 2013, there are 155.7 million workers in the United States over the age of 16.  Many of them won’t get the holiday that is set aside for them to celebrate because they will have to work.  A good chunk of the workers in the United States are working in retail . . . approximately 4.3 million of them . . . who will not be off due to the fact that most retailers are open for their big Labor Day sales.  Kind of ironic isn’t it?

Looking over the history of the labor movement and the establishment of a national holiday to honor labor, one could argue that the actual holiday is set aside—though indirectly—to honor those dozen or so people who were killed in the Pullman strike and riots in Chicago.  That would make it a holiday for the death of someone.  One would argue whether or not it is a celebration or an appeasement when viewing a history that has taken decades to bring fairness and justice to the labor practices of industry . . . the eight hour work day . . . the history of the five-day, 40 hour work week . . . child labor laws . . . payment for overtime . . . health benefits . . . and on and on the list could go.  The arguments are still there.  And, why? Probably because such changes effect the profit margin of industry . . . usually to the lower end.  When this happens industry makes less money.  Money deals with economics.  Economics is what makes the world spin around.  It is a religion in the minds and hearts of many.

Very few of us who celebrate the big three-day weekend of observing Labor Day on the first Monday of each September actually know anything about the holiday.  As much as Mr. Gompers wants to believe that it is a non-religious holiday, I just cannot agree.  I cannot agree because the almighty dollar is the altar that many of us worship . . . that gives us purpose and meaning . . . that dictates our lives . . . that gets us out of bed every morning.  The truth of the matter is that we, as a nation, would not be where we are today in the economic world if it were not for the dedication and hard work that was put in by those who labor through the years . . . but, the question is: Who profits?  It is not the common laborer.  Someone has been getting rich off all of this . . . and, it is not the common laborer.

As much as I would like to embrace the mythology behind Labor Day, thanks to people like Mr. Samuel Gompers, I find it difficult to jump on that bandwagon in ignorance.  History that is based on facts, not wishful thinking and mythology, usually paints a different story than the one that most Americans embrace and celebrate . . . and this is true in other nations too.  I appreciate the gift of a three-day weekend that Labor Day affords those of us able to actually take it off and celebrate it; yet, at the same time I do not want to fool myself into thinking that it is a pure and simple gesture of gratitude for all the hard work of millions of laborers—past and present.  For a great many, unbeknownst to them, it is a religious holiday . . . a holiday of remembrance for those who gave their lives for equal rights and justice . . . and, based on the fact that many retailers are open, an altar to the almighty dollars that is making someone rich.

As usual, this is my rant . . . my opinion.  But, I ask you: how much do you really know about Labor Day . . . about what you are celebrating?  Labor Day is more than the unofficial end to summer.  What is it?  Well, it depends on who you ask?  Those who run the world’s economy will say one thing, those who are doing all the work another, and those of us who are celebrating it even another.  Maybe we need to sit down and talk . . . wouldn’t you agree, Mr. Gompers?  Happy Labor Day everyone!

The Rest of the Story

I kind of had a love/hate relationship with Paul Harvey . . . though he never even knew we were in a relationship.  Like most good Midwesterners, I was a Paul Harvey fan and would love to eat my lunch listening to him share his own spin on his popular radio news show when he was alive.  Then he got commercial . . . he began letting his political views into his news . . . and, in my opinion, the show began to slip.  But that was not the show that made me a fan of his . . . it was his short radio broadcast known as Now, the Rest of the Story.  This was one of those shows that challenged the listener to determine whether he or she really knew the background story or the actual history to information that the majority of the population understood as the gospel truth.  On this show he would tease the listeners with a tidbit of a story that would grab one's interest, then he would break for a commercial before coming back to give the listeners with the facts . . . with the truth . . . or, what he called, the rest of the story.  Amazingly, he usually blew the preconceived ideas and understandings of what the listeners thought was the truth right out of the water.  Then, smugly, he would remark, “Now, you know the rest of the story . . . good day!”

Over the years, through experience, I have come to appreciate and value the rest of the story.  My primary reason for having come to this appreciation is the fact that most of us do not know the whole story when it comes to a lot of things in life we take for granted . . . people, places, things, and history.    Take history, for example.  There is a lot about our history as a nation that we have all wrong . . . a lot about it that we do not really understand . . . a lot of it we do not even know, but we think we do.  A lot of it we have never been taught . . . at least not correctly in our schools.  One of the reason is that most--if not all--history is written from the winner's perspective . . . rarely--if at all--do we ever hear the loser's point-of-view.

This registered with me about thirty years ago when I read a book (Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War by Tony Horwitz) that my parents gave me about a Civil War reenactor who toured all the war's battle sites.  What I learned in reading that book was that all the battle sites actually had two names . . . one was the name given by the Union forces, the other was the name given by the Confederate forces.  So, whose names do you think are attached to all the signage at these national sites?  That is right, the Union's . . . after all, they won the war.  But that does not make the South happy . . . in a lot of their minds the war isn’t over . . . their side of the story isn’t the primary or even a part of the history that is taught in schools.  To get a better understanding one needs to know all sides of the story to get the whole story.

Though winners often write the history, that is not always the case.  Right here in our area of Montana . . . down the road south of us . . . is a prime example of how the “rest of the story” is not always shared, nor is the actual history given correctly.  Down the road is the Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument . . . known for years, and still referred to by many, as "Custer's Last Stand".  Now my understanding is that Custer got his butt kicked—literally, and did not live to tell the story.  But you would have never known that in the way that it was portrayed in history books.  It was a “fluke win” for the Indians . . . they just got lucky, and Custer was an egotistical fool who made a few mistakes.  This was not a battle that the cavalry won . . . not even close.  But from the stories that circulated for decades and generations, one would have thought otherwise.  It took years and years of fussing and fighting for the true story to come out . . . for the rest of the story, and still today it isn't quite all there.  When going to the actual battle site one still wonders if the Indians won—even today.  So, history is not always written by the winners . . . sometimes it is written by those who are in power.

But the point is, the "rest of the story" is important in understanding . . . understanding the history . . . understanding the people . . . understanding places . . . cultures . . . races . . .

I think that hearing the “rest of the story” is going to be vital in our survival as a nation and as a society . . . as a community.  I think that the “rest of the story” is the foundation of something that Jesus taught, and something that I have been called to practice as a follower of his . . . hospitality.  Unfortunately hospitality is not what most of us so-called Christians believe it is.  Hospitality is not putting out coffee and cookies after the worship service.  Hospitality is not having a cookout or potluck dinner.  Hospitality is not walking up to the stranger in the worship service, shaking hands, and introducing yourself before going back to our seat.  Hospitality is not putting money in the plate for a mission project.  It is not collecting food for the local food pantry.  It is not lifting someone else up in prayer in their time of need.  Hospitality is not just opening one's house to another. 

Hospitality is learning the "rest of the story" . . . it is taking the time to listen to another and getting to know them for who they really are . . . knowing them for who God created them to be . . . not preconceived ideas and notions about them, but who they really are.  And, hospitality is confronting our prejudices and preconceived ideas about people and correcting them to reflect the reality and truth . . . of reflecting the "rest of the story".  As the followers of Jesus this is what he asked us to do when he challenged us to be a people of hospitality.

We all know that there are always at least two sides to every story, but usually we only hear one side of the story.  We do this with the so-called news we read and hear every day.  If we only watch one news network, we only get one perspective on the news whether it be a mainline network like ABC, CBS, or NBC (all considered to be liberal) or a cable news network like Fox News  (considered to be conservative) we only get one side and one view of the news.  There are a whole bunch of other networks out there that report the news—often much better than these guys.  When this is our mode of operation and the basis of our understanding, we don't get the whole story . . . we don't get the “rest of the story”.  We are not being hospitable.  Any time we get all of our understanding of anything from only one source, we are cheating ourselves and others from truly understanding the truth and reality of any given person, place, thing, or history.  We are not listening to the "rest of the story".  We are not following Jesus very well . . . we are not practicing hospitality.

Jesus asked that we practice hospitality . . . to welcome the stranger . . . not only physically, but also mentally and spiritually . . . to invite them to sit at the table and become a part of the family.  This can only take place when we are willing to listen, to really listen . . . to the "rest of the story".  It can only happen when we are willing to hear the story of others from their understanding, and to grapple with the ways that it challenges our understanding.  It comes from honoring the stories of others and their experience as valid and life-giving experiences equal to our own.  It is a willingness to admit differences, but still be accepting and supportive.  It is being willing to discern and reconcile that which separates so that we can be whole and holy.  If we cannot embrace and practice this sort of "hospitality" then we will never get it . . . we will never have a table where all God's children are gathered . . . where all are welcome . . . where the family—God’s family—is restored.

So, where do we begin?  We begin where we are.  We begin with our daily lives.  We begin practicing hospitality where we are.  There is only one story . . . God’s story.  It would sure be nice if we could bring all the chapters of the story together.  We need to listen to the “rest of the story”.  As Paul Harvey would say, “Now you know the rest of the story . . . good day!”