Every so often I will read something
that gets me to thinking. The August 4,
2014 issue of Time magazine had an
article that caught my attention and created a rumbling in the ol’ rock garden
I call my mind. It was an article about
atheist churches and their growth in popularity . . . even in the Bible
Belt! Basically it stated that atheists are
gathering into church-like organizations where they gather once a week for something
that resembles—minus the dogma and ritual—church. They just drop the religion and God out of
the gathering. From what the article
stated there is not much difference between what the atheists are doing and
what a lot of people experience in their church . . . just none of the
religious propaganda. Everything but God.
And, the atheists are loving it . . .
they are eating it up . . . and, apparently, the movement is growing.
So, what is it about the “church” that
they are embracing while refusing the rhetoric, theological dogma, and ritual
of the church. From what I gathered a typical
atheistic gathering would start out a lot like the “church”. There would be music (but no congregational
singing as that is too churchy), greeting of one another, listening to a
message, some more music, and then lots of fellowship. Though they will not call it “church”, it
sure sounds a lot like “church”.
The author of the article, Josh
Sanburn, seems to think that the purpose behind the birth of these non-churchy
gatherings serves to make connections between people who believe in a similar
manner . . . to create a support system for one another . . . to discuss issues
and topics relevant to what believe. It
is to find a place where one belongs . . . to have relationships . . . to
connect. One individual who leads such a
non-church gathering stated: “. . . if we don’t offer regular human community
and support for nonbelievers, it would be detrimental to the movement.” As the author wrote in the article, there is
strength in numbers.
Sounds like the atheists have finally
caught up to the “church”.
The article got me to thinking . . .
and, that my friends, is a scary proposition.
Made me wonder about what it was that atheists found in the “church”
that was of importance . . . enough importance to imitate it in their own
way. What did they find that was
relevant and necessary for its own purpose and survival that was equivalent to
those who claim to be “religious” . . . who claim to be among the faithful? What were the commonalities?
Having read the article several times
the number one thing that I found was that both the “church” and the atheist
version of the non-church was . . . relationships. The atheists came to the realization that it
needed relationships to survive . . . to exist.
It needed to find people of the same mind set . . . no beliefs, mind
you, because that smacks of religion . . . to get together with to relate to. It needed to find community. Community being a word that I usually define
as being a group who gathers under a “common unity”. It thrives, just like the “church”, on
relationships between people . . . between connecting with another.
Now, that is the foundation of what I
believe as a believer . . . as a follower of Jesus . . . as, heaven forbid, a Christian. Relationships. As a follower of Jesus the first and most
important relationship is between me and God.
The second, and actually just as important, is my relationship with
others. Jesus told us followers, us
believers, that these were the two most important commandments . . . loving God
and others. Under these two fell all the
laws and other commandments. Because of
that I think that relationships are the most important . . . the actual
foundation . . . of what it means to be the “church”. Relationships are important. Plus, as the author stated in the article,
there is strength in numbers.
Everything else that the atheists
embrace from the “church” are actually secondary methods of creating
relationship. So, it comes down to
relationships. The atheist non-church
church comes together in order to relate . . . to relate to one another and the
common good of all. The only thing
missing is God . . . or is God missing?
It seems to me that what the atheists
are embracing is the same thing that the religious folk are embracing . . .
relationships. Through relationships
people learn how to care for others, how to listen to others, how to love
others, and now to be community. Through
relationships people grow . . . they grow to discover a bigger and broader
world around themselves . . . they grow to learn more about who they are and
how they fit into the bigger scheme of the world around them. Through relationships they learn to love
themselves and others. Through
relationships they find purpose and meaning.
Through relationships . . . well, they have a reason to live. As it is with the atheists, so it is with the
religious . . . with the faithful.
The author states that this weekly
ritual of gathering that the atheists are beginning to embrace is simply a part
of human nature . . . but, he writes, it is something more. He writes: It is something they can all believe in.
That got me to thinking more. M. Scott Peck once wrote that there are no
atheists in the world because all people believe in something. According to Peck whatever a person believes
in becomes his or her religion . . . his or her faith . . . his or her
purpose. He goes on to write that to be
a true atheist a person could not believe in anything, including him or herself
. . . there would be no reason for living . . . no purpose. Thus, he argued, there are no atheists.
In the New Testament the Apostle Paul
speaks to a crowd in a secular city. He
speaks to them in a sort of community gathering place with lots of statues
dedicated to the gods of many religions . . . including one to the “unknown god”. It is to that “unknown god” that the apostle
directs his statements proclaiming to the people that they are not that far
from believing. So it is that atheists
have been betrayed by their own beliefs as they embrace that which resembles
the church. In pursuing relationships
they are ever so close to being religious. I would argue that they are religious since
they actually do believe in something that calls them to be a community.
I think there is a lesson for the “church”
to learn from this movement within the atheist ranks. I think they highlight what it is that is the
foundation of the faith . . . relationships.
At least that is what I think.
This is not a deep analysis of the issue. These are just ponderings of a wayward mind
whose curiosity was piqued by an article in Time
magazine. I am sure that it could be
ripped to shreds by the academics . . . also by the conservative fundamental
believers; yet, at the same time I think that the religious . . . the faithful
. . . the “church” needs to take this movement serious as it considers what we
have in common that actually brings us closer together. It seems we are all working our way back
home, though some of us are not really sure there is a “home” to get back
to. But, the one thing that we can agree
on is that relationships are the foundation of whatever it is we are attempting
to live up to.
As usual, we aren’t all going to get
there the same way. Sometimes what we
believe in betrays what we feel within our hearts. Sometimes we just need to live and let live
as we help one another in whatever journey we are on. The journey is always easier when we walk
together. Maybe the time has come to
trash the word “church” and focus on community . . . that which we have in
common. In such relationship we will
discover what it means to relate and love one another. Well, at least that was what I was thinking
after I read the article . . . on well!